Image
Interordi Menu
Staff Backer Doctacosa
Admin
SciLab Official
Benevolent Dictator
Offline
6437 posts
Squid beaker
Squid beaker
Earned all 150 original CL achievements
Acquired on 17 January 2016
Unity.EXE emblem
Unity.EXE emblem
Defeat Bass.EXE in the AFD2013 event!
Acquired on 1 April 2013
Zenny
Zenny
Unlock all of the main forum features!
Acquired on 1 April 2014
Princess Celestia
Princess Celestia
Got all items in the AFD2012 event!
Acquired on 1 April 2012
Lilly Satou
Lilly Satou
Acquired on 1 April 2012

... and 25 more
Quote

There are things in the gaming universe that bother me. Stupid decisions, bad design ideas, dumb moves; the companies we want to like can act like fools sometimes. I'm making this topic to share some of my annoyances, feel free to share your own experiences too.

---

It's been known for a while that some companies like Ubisoft have added a "feature" in their PC releases that makes the game "phone home". If your Internet connection gets cut for any reason, even for an instant, your game quits without even saving. The goal of this thing, of course, is to limit game piracy by making use that all players have a valid license. The dumb fact is that this applies to single player mode too, which means you can't play when you don't have a link to the web. This, and previous anti-piracy measures that go completely overboard, make me boycott Ubisoft's games on the PC. There are plenty of other companies making games that I do want to play while they respect me as a paying customer.

Even dumber, in my opinion, comes from a major mobile gaming company that I won't name here. I purchased and installed one of their big titles on my cellphone to play on the go. However, again as an anti-piracy measure, the game phones home once every few days. That means that it connects to a server of the company to ensure that my installed copy is a valid one. If it can't establish a connection, it'll force itself to quit. The problem is, I don't have a data plan as it's too expensive for what it's worth. As such, unless I remember the launch the game at home every few days (where I've got a Wi-Fi connection), the game becomes unplayable. This is incredibly backwards as I've got that game to play it on the go only, NOT when I'm at home! Furthermore, I'll often try to play it in the city's subway system, where even a data plan wouldn't help me. By trying to preserve their sales, the company is only hurting itself as I'll think twice in the future about making another purchase.


The admin formerly known as Dr. Cossack.

Looking for me elsewhere? Maybe look at my Fediverse account for some more-or-less random postings! If you're a gamer, check out my Osmium profile. I'm building that tool!

RisingDragon
Goat Herder
Inactive
-4295 post
Lilly Satou
Lilly Satou
Acquired on 2 April 2012
Emi Ibarazaki
Emi Ibarazaki
Acquired on 2 April 2012
Demoman
Demoman
Acquired on 2 April 2012
Pyro
Pyro
Acquired on 2 April 2012
Heavy
Heavy
Acquired on 2 April 2012

... and 18 more
Quote

Most forms of DRM these days are getting more and more draconian and it's only hurting the companies--there was huge public backlash when it was revealed that Diablo III would only be playable, regardless if you were on single player or multiplayer--while being connected to the internet. So you can't play this game during bad weather that'll disrupt the internet, or play on a long plane ride. Hell, when questioned about it, Blizzard flat out told people to "play some other game" during such times. Would it really kill them to make it so that single player doesn't need a constant internet connection to play?

Another really bad example of DRM: Mass Effect 3 for the PC. If you play multiplayer, and use the quick match option to try and find a simple match to play, there's a small chance you might end up on a hacked server. And if you do, that's it. Your entire EA account is toast--EA will ban you for playing on a hacked server, accident or not. By doing so, you lose access to any games you bought on their Origin platform, including Mass Effect 3, which is exclusive to Origin. So you've bought more than one game on Origin, EA's essentially stealing all of that money. All in the name of anti-piracy! *sigh*

EA in general tends to piss me off. Their policies tend to do some pretty hefty damage to games--like Battlefield 2142. The one Battlefield game I've ever been interested in playing, and I can't ever play it. I could only play it on my Windows XP computer, which wasn't good enough to play it consistently without crashing. When I got my current machine, which uses Windows Vista, it had the specs to handle it.

Except for the fact that it used Windows Vista. Battlefield 2142 can't run on Vista; but EA was kind enough to make some patches to allow it to run on Vista! Unless you use the 64 bit version of Vista, that means you're pretty much screwed; EA only released patches for XP 32 bit, XP 64 bit, and Vista 32 bit and refused, for whatever reason, to make one for Vista 64 bit, and ignored pretty much every request on their official forums to make one.

Then there's the whole EA/Bioware PR disaster that came with Mass Effect 3 and it's ending... but that's spoileriffic so I won't get into it here. Bioware's support for their games after launch is also pretty terrible. Full of bugs? You'll have to wait months for a patch and you'll be lucky if you get more than one. And they won't fix all problems, even if they're pretty major. For the record, you still can't run Dragon Age: Origins - Awakening and the Dragon Age: Origins: Soldier's Peak DLC without having some incompatibility issues with items in-game. On the PC version, you can install some mods to fix that (though the nature of the bug means you're uninstalling it and reinstalling it every time you make a new game). Xbox or Playstation versions? You're shit outta luck! You also can't import items acquired from Soldier's Peak into the Awakening expansion, EVEN THOUGH THEY MENTION THE EVENTS IN THAT DLC IN AWAKENING. They've never bothered to explain why, either.

Dragon Age II had some pretty bad bugs in it, one of which would permanently mangle your character's attack speed. It took MONTHS for them to fix it.


"Why do you care that I care that you care enough to care that I care for caring?" "Conversation isn't your strong point, is it?"
"I worship the supreme comrade Cossack!"
"OugharagarraaahhHHH: When 'Ow' just won't cut it."
ImageImage
Image

CAPCOM: We put the "No" in Innovation.

WindRider739
Cyberspace Ghost Hunter
Offline
331 posts
Quote

*Points at the PS3* That.

While free online has it's perks and they HAVE managed to improve the online quality, little things like having trouble reading their own discs without workaround, lollygagging until far too late on release, price drops and backwards compatibility, as well as outright terrible customer service and - this is the big one - INCREDIBLY INSECURE SERVERS AND AN INABILITY TO PROTECT THEIR CUSTOMERS, I simply have no desire to play with it.

While I loved the PS1 and adore the PS2 on a level usually reserved for the SNES, the PS3 has seen no end of issues, and that's reflected in the amount of quality games released for it. While we can argue that Medal of Brothers Recon Duty is good - and while it's not my kind of game, I won't argue - there's simply not enough content beyond that to really warrant my buying it. I've owned two (Friends threw them out because they stopped working) which I refurbished, and my room mate has also owned two, there's simply not enough there anymore.

And it makes me sad inside, Sony. You killed a part of my childhood. Well... Man-boyhood. But whatever. The conversion from Sony Fanboy to Microsoft - MICROSOFT! I WORK WITH COMPUTERS CONSTANTLY! - fan was a painful one.

I hold up hope that they'll keep their losses to a minimum and learn from their mistakes with the PS4. God, I hope they stay in the race.

But the Steam and Google concept consoles sound amazing.


Image