Yes, they have. Man, they say that the Capcom doesn\'t know how to do 3-D... and Jak 2 got a A+ (Damn it, why do the more popular games get the good scores?). They compared and said that Jak 2 is more fun than X7... damn it....

Well, share your ideas here. And one more thing: This guy that was rating X7 said that the game sucked because you couldn\'t play as X until you beat like 5 levels. He also said this: \"You must beat five levels to get X. Yes, five. If you don\'t, you don\'t get X\". Idiot, people are A LOT better than he is, so he shouldn\'t give kids ideas on how to do things. Anyways, thats all I have to say.

[Edited on 31-10-2003 by Zera]

Does this change the ideas you had on the game?

Post redacted

My advice is to just get used to it. People who aren\'t Megaman fans always rate Megaman games lower than the fans think. Those who don\'t play Megaman usually don\'t see what\'s so great that the fanbase does. Or maybe it\'s just they don\'t agree. But Megaman isn\'t really that popular outside of it\'s fanbase, I don\'t think. It\'s not like other series(Say, like Zelda or whatever) that most people generally seem to agree is good.

I dunno! NOM gave MMNT a fair rating! They basically said it\'s a cool game with a mean difficulty rating.

I know. This sucks. Maybe Capcom can make their own mag.? That would be pretty cool. Like spoilers and all that stuff. And they couldn\'t make fun of their games. But yeah, I could of thought of a better rating... like a B+ (the cameras (sp?) suck).

Something you never say with 2D games...

[Edited on 31/10/03 by D Hell]

Well i\'ve beaten it i wouid give it a b+