Perfection. No less. For one thing, I would like humans and nature to exist side by side for mutual benifit, rather than our current insustainable lifestyle.

Considering I\'m the most awesomest guy ever out of all history, I wouldn\'t change a thing. Except maybe being able to shoot lightning bolts out of my hand. ZAAAP!

[Edited on 26-6-2005 by Necro]

Or out of your eyes? Laser-robo-super-eye-beams!

Nah, world peace isn\'t good, because it can\'t last. Everlasting world peace isn\'t a good idea either, because peace doesn\'t assure goodness. I think I would wish for (keeping in mind I can have ANYTHING) an end to sin. Without sin, man would be guided only by God, and wouldn\'t make sinful decisions. Even if this world is too far gone to save by human means, no matter how untainted, everyone could reach heaven, so ultimately everyone could live a natural lifespan and then die and ascend to heaven. Haha. AimMan is so idealistic with his silly wish.

And many must have just thought me to be extremely foolish. But I still think it\'s a nice wish. Unobtainable by any means I can imagine, but it would be great.

I would change nothing because I truly believe that we\'re already following a plan. Sure, things suck now, but I know it the end it will work out. Yeah, call me a sap, call me idealistic, but that\'s how I feel; I\'d never change the past or the future. Things like that have a way of blowing up in your face. I can only speak for myself and live my own life, and you never know- I may just affect someone else\'s.

-Ri

Sex is an act of love, spoiled and adulterated by lust.



Man, I\'d want a samich from Wendy\'s named after me...
Oh the possibility...

Sex is simply pre-procreation, but sometimes humans are silly and try to uhhh.. \"jazz it up\" with romance and Fabio. But yeah, maybe it\'s because \"God\" is a chick, but I sure as hell wouldn\'t want to cry during/after sex. Sex is supposed to fun and enjoyable, not a time consuming soap opera.

A girlfriend.:eek:
Everbody but me has one.:(

Here\'s a thought for you kitty, you say not being selfishness, yet the very idea of the world being exactly as you want it to be is selfish.

This is not an insult, just something to make you think.

My perfect world would be that I could blast the lamers through the monitors for being stupid.

Only if I wish. All I can do is hope their computers explode. *twitch*

I\'m well aware that there\'s nothing perfect and that trying to strive for perfection would be too much unnecessary waste of energy that could be used elsewhere.

...ah, cynicalism.

*Sigh.* Well, it\'s a little belated to be mentioning this, but here\'s my thoughts on sex, people. I don\'t know about crying before and after it; that doesn\'t exactly seem like a good thing to me, but it\'s not just there for the fun of it; people throw it around like it means nothing these days, but it SHOULD mean something. Unfortunately, it often doesn\'t. I know anything I say here can\'t change anyone else\'s mind, but since this is a day for stating oppinion, I\'ll state mine anyway. Whenever you give yourself to someone, whether you admit it or not, that\'s a piece of yourself you\'ll never get back. I know that my saying \"one man, one woman,\" seems idealistic in this day and age, but that\'s what I believe. If you don\'t like it... tough. As I said, this is a place for stating oppinion, and that\'s mine.

-Ri

Nah, saying the California thing wasn\'t implying gayness.. I just saw commercials for \"Trading Spouses\" or whatever that stupid show is.. And some married fellow in California got a traded wife from Texas or something, and she had to deal with his frequent crying... :rofl:

And I didn\'t imply sex shouldn\'t mean anything. I mean, if consenting adults want a quick..well you know, then I think that\'s fine. Go for it I sez. No it shouldn\'t be done if one of the persons will be regretting it in the morning. No it shouldn\'t be done if there\'s going to be consequences from it. But if it\'s two (or ten) consenting folks having fun then I don\'t see anything wrong with that. It still means something.

BUT I\'M JUST A DIRTY HEATHEN so what do I know. Ask Mega X.

Yeah, I see your little trap. I\'m not gonna fall for it, though.

You damn dirty heathen!

Oh...wait...

>_>


Well I\'m one of those people who\'s going to wait until marriage. And that\'s really about it.

People want to have sex because our hormones tell us that we do. While it can be combined with love, hormones are still what drives people to do it. There is absolutely no reason why everyone should consider it strictly an act of love.

But if you do consider it as such and are saving yourself completely for that special someone, all the power to you.

Though, honestly I think waiting until marriage is kinda silly. There\'s no guarentee your partner feels the same way. And even if they do, it\'d be horrible to find out after marriage that you have horrible sexual chemistry.

Love. Sex. Which came first? Sex, definately. Inf fact, as far as reasoning is concerned, sex is the more important. Love can make two people happy, but it is completly pointless without sex. Sex is what drives the human race forwards and like it or not, we can\'t live without it. I agree that dumping someone because of the size of their cock is a little odd, to say the least, but I won\'t say that sex shouldn\'t come into it at all.

Well, we can live without it. The human race would just die.

But I\'m just arguing semantics here.

If the human race dies, how is that living?

Well, everyone seems pretty set in their oppinion here, but I want to offer you a handshake, Mega X.exe. I know it\'s kinda hard to stand up for what you believe, especially when few others share your oppinion. I respect you for that, and I share your point of view. Sex is overrated, in a way; people think it\'s pretty much standard to screw the person you\'re dating, but I myself would rather say, \"I loved you enough to wait,\" than \"I loved you enough to throw it away in a moment.\" I\'ve seen a lot of people emotionally scarred from not practicing abstinance, and I think it\'s pretty sad that sex is treated so casually. I can honestly say that if I had slept with my last boyfriend, who I honestly thought I was going to marry, I would have a lot of trouble looking my fiance now in the eye. I suppose a lot of you are going to argue against me here, but it doesn\'t change my convictions about it. I\'m just glad that someone up here feels somewhat the same way.

-Ri

And I meant survival of the human race, by saying we can\'t live without it.

Sorry. I misinterpreted what you meant.