If you have common sense, by reading the thread\'s name you know this is going to contain spoilers for Spider Man: The Movie. So, if you haven\'t read it yet, read no further.
I haven\'t bought it yet myself, but I checked the mag out in a bookstore here in my town and it seems like Stan Lee did the writing... I forgot the artist\'s name, but the art was decent. Average, fitting the movie characterizations well.
One of things that I saw, though, is the difference of some scenes. Spidey\'s making more wisecracks than in the movie (Green Goblin tells him that together they could turn the town \"upside down\" if they joined forces, and Spidey replies \"I dunno... I feel dizzy upside down.\" for an example), some other scenes seemed to be cut out (like when MJ visits Aunt May in the hospital and she and Peter chats). However, there\'s one scene that seems to be smacking in your face Harry Osborn\'s becoming the second Green Goblin. In Norman\'s burial, he tells Peter \"Spider Man\'s going to pay for what he\'s done to me... but YOU, Peter, will always be my greatest friend.\" The scene where Pete and MJ kiss was slight modified as well.
Well, if you\'ve read the comic, you know all the ones above. So, all in all, which did you prefer? The cinema version, or the adaptation for the comic books?
As you can see, it didn't take Zero long to begin forgetting about Iris. zero U playar lol
If you're one of the two persons who sent me a PM 2 years ago, thank you! And sorry for not replying.

