Image
Interordi Menu
Mega X.exe
Forum Ghost
Offline
6444 posts
Quote

Well? Spill it. I think its completely wrong.

[Edited on 6/5/2004 by Mega X.exe]

Kia_Purity
Solid Kia
Inactive
1184 posts
Quote

Uh... this kind of topic shouldn\'t be posted because both sides tend to fight.


--Mod of Ioekaki--

Best quotes from IRC:
* DrCossack hits Evan on the head with Zero's thong.
<Kia_Purity> wat <Kia_Purity> "Queen of Interordi" <Kia_Purity> who did that? XD (from april fools '06)
* DragonBlayde thwacks Mega_X with Kia's thongs <Kia_Purity> NOT MY THONGS

Mega X.exe
Forum Ghost
Offline
6444 posts
Quote

Well, I personally would rather that both sides respectfully duke this out. I have evidence to support my case, I\'ll post it tomorrow if this topic is still around.

Gutter Mouth
Plastic Grass
Inactive
653 posts
Quote

well well well, if you think its so wrong, what would you do if you were a woman and you were a rape victim. 9 hormonal months later your ganna have a baby of a villian who did wrong to your body OR you could just kill the little bugger. Which would you choose, it wonder....

HollowTorment
Interordi's Lovable Jerk
Inactive
4805 posts
Quote

I agree with Gutter..in a sense. If he\'s pro-choice anyway.

It\'s not a guys decision, to make a woman carry a baby just because he wants it to live or what have you. She has to deal with it, she has to feed it and clothe it and take care of it for the rest of it\'s life. It\'s her decision if she wants to deal with that. (And yes I\'m referring to when a baby is an \'accident\'. Usually after that, the guy becomes absent..doesn\'t take responsibility.)

If I was a chick and had an unplanned pregnancy with a guy that didn\'t want to provide..you better believe I\'d terminate the bugger. Yeah yeah, \"omg hollow you have no repsect 4 human lief\". Actually I respect it alot, and that\'s why I wouldn\'t bring up a baby by myself.

But anyways..all you \'pro-life\' people don\'t usually realize that abortions will still happen even if you do get rid of abortion clinics. So..we either have clean, safe places for abortions to occur in..or they\'ll happen somewhere secluded with \'instruments\' like clothes hangers.

I know you all won\'t ever change your mind, but it\'s just something to think about.

Okay, I said my piece..the topic can be closed now. ;) :lol:

EDIT: And oh yeah..I saw those big displays that extremist \'pro-life\'rs have put up at colleges and the like..of a bunch of dead fetuses and stuff. I don\'t see the point of showing pictures of dead babies in order to promote \'pro-life\'. But I thought the pictures were kinda cool. I said something like \"Cool, dead babies!\" and people were disgusted with me. :rofl:

[Edited on 5-6-2004 by HollowTorment]

BladeMan.EXE
Just A-Lurkin' Now
Inactive
1624 posts
Quote

I\'m split down the middle on this topic. My morals collide with my logic. In other words, I think it\'s wrong to kill a living, and eventually sentient, being, but abortion can be essential to controlling overpopulation of our planet. So, I\'m really not sure what to support.


The Future of the Net Sprite Comic

My deviantART

~Dwarven Vow #4~
Don't depend on others. Walk on your own two feet.
^ Apply the above to video game help unless you have no other choice.

"94% of all teenagers have tried drugs at one time or another. If you are one of the 6% that haven't, put this message in your signature."

Gutter Mouth
Plastic Grass
Inactive
653 posts
Quote

Yeah so...... im thinking that if i was a teenage momma and i had some dudes baby all up in me. Even if it was the dude that i am madly in love with (Remeber this is not real. this is for examples sake. im not madly in love with any men...) I wouldn\'t want the hellish thing in me anyway. Think of the money, the loss of sleep, loss of contact with the outside social world, to puking, the diapers, the whineing........ but that is the mother\'s choice. If she wants to deal with that stuff by all means dont use a condom. But for me..... kill it, KILL IT!

And this is just me now. in like 15 year i might want a baby who knows... even if i didnt i wouldn\'t kill it just use a condom. nip it in the bud.

Remeber!- No glove, no love.

I think i learned that off of someone off the board. i think it was WR... who knows...

Necro
Hail to the King, baby!
Inactive
1265 posts
Quote

This is quite a common debate topic that one would see on online messageboards. Topics on this subject have heated up on past message boards, but I\'d like to have faith in the members here that we can be mature enough to talk about such a topic without flames. Please, everyone, don\'t break this faith of mine. :)

For a short answer, I\'m pro-choice.

For a long answer, well...

I\'d like to start that the question asked is abit too idealistic. Abortion isn\'t a topic that is simply black and white; right or wrong. One really has to consider many factors that go into abortion before really forming an opinion. At least I believe so.

As a male, I believe it is my duty to take the pro-choice option. I\'m quite aware that there are many males that don\'t agree with this notion, but I personally feel as a male, I cannot make decisions that primarly affects the opposite gender because honestly, I don\'t think any male can have the same understanding on the subject that a female can. I can\'t ever get pregnant, thankfully, so I cannot understand what it\'d be like to be in a position where I\'d have to give birth to a baby when my judgement on the situation is telling me otherwise. I don\'t feel that it\'s a male\'s place to condemn females to something such as this, because males cannot simply understand the situation as well as a female could.

Also, I\'d like to state that I don\'t like to hold others to my own morality(or lack of). That is just unfair.

A woman can get pregnant even if she takes precautions. Hell, condoms don\'t even work all the time. If this was the case and a woman didn\'t want to have a baby or wasn\'t ready at that point in her life, I think it\'d be understandable if she had an abortion. Women shouldn\'t be subjected to only being involved in sexual activities with the intent of having a baby because the majority of males don\'t have that idea. Unless the entire population of both genders switched to those kind of ideals(which will never happen), I think it\'d be unfair to tell a woman she\'d have to have a baby just because she had sex.

This isn\'t saying that that\'s the case for all abortion cases. What does one do in the situation of rape? Do you condemn a woman to have a child when she was forced, forced to do the activities that conceived it?

Though too, there are alot of girls that are just plain stupid and use abortion to get out of the mistake they made of having unprotected sex. In such a situation, if that was the woman\'s decision, I\'d think it\'d be best because such a person probably wouldn\'t make a good mother. Though, you never know.

However, as much as one wants to consider the possibilities of how the situation of the female getting pregnant that want\'s the abortion, the fact that abortions will be around whether it\'s legal or not holds true. In our society today, abortion has become something that we all know about, even if not everyone agrees on the same principles. Simply making it illegal now isn\'t going to make it go away, and if it was illegal, it\'s only going to make things worse for females. We\'d have alot of cases of girls getting abortions in back alleys with coathangers, and that simply isn\'t healthy for them.

Another part I\'d like to cover is I\'ve often seen people say that people should give babies up for adoption instead of abortion. It\'s a nice idea when you don\'t put alot of thought into it. There are already many, many orphans out there today. Orphans are often viewed as a file and not a person by the government; I know this because one of my best friends happens to be one. Suffice to say, they don\'t get the best treatment in life. There are many who get adopted, but there are also many who don\'t. Instead of adding to a problem that already exists, it is of my opinion that those who believe adoption is better than abortion should really try to help children who are already born and need a home, not add more to the situation. Honestly, if someone isn\'t willing to adopt a child themself, why would they tell another to put their child up for adoption?

I could go on longer, but nah. I believe that women should have the choice to abort a baby if they decide to. I\'m sure it\'s not an easy decision for most women to make, either. But I believe they should have the ability to make the choice to have a baby or not.


Mega X.exe
Forum Ghost
Offline
6444 posts
Quote

Very convincing Necro. However, I\'d like to quote Sean Hannity. He, like myself, is a conservative. This taken from his book Let Freedom Ring. I suggest you read it. WARNING: You may be offended by this, read at your own risk, and keep in mind, this was written in 2002.



Quote:
Liberals say they\'re pro-choice. But they\'re not.
They\'re pro-abortion.
Think about it. They insist that a woman\'s sovereignty over her own body (read: her convenience) trumps the right to life of an unborn innocent. Women, they say, should have the unfettered right to choose. But what about choice in other walks of life? Then it\'s a different story. When it comes to women\'s freedom to choose better, safer schools for their children—many of whom are trapped in low-quality, dangerous public schools—they\'re anti-choice. The Left opposes tution tax credits, vouchers, K-12 educational savings accounts, and most other forms of parental choice in education.

Similarly, when it comes to women terrorized by criminals, the Left doesn\'t support a women\'s \"freedom to choose\" to buy a handgun and carry it in her purse or under her jacket should she need it to defend her life or the lives of her children. The Left doesn\'t trust the individual to make the right vhoices concerning her own personal security.

The Left doesn\'t believe in choice when it comes to hardworking folks choosing their own personal retirement accounts within the context of Social Security, with the potentialof yielding two to three times the earnings of the Social Security system, ehich gives them less than a paltry 2 percent return on their money. The result: large numbers of seniors are living on poverty\'s edge in a situation that\'s only going to get worse as baby boomers retire and the ratio of producers to beneficiaries dramatically declines. But again, the Left doesn\'t trus indiviudals to make the right decisions concerning their own financial security.

So while the Left makes a big deal about the sancticity of choice, we see that choice itself is not the issue. The Left doesn\'t champion the individual\'s right in a host og other areas and prefers to cede control over those decisions to the government. No, this isn\'t about freedom, unless you mean it in the narrowest of contexts.

This is about a woman\'s freedom to terminate life within her womb. But even here, the dirving force motivating the anti-lifers isn\'t freedom. If it were, the most engaged advocates of \"choice\" wouldn\'t be neutral on which choice the woman ultimately makes. How else do you explain, for instance, their opposition to advising pregnant women of the potentially psychologically devasating impact of that procedure?

Check out the websites of Planned Parenthood and some of the other most militant pro-abortionists and see if I\'m exaggerating about their predisposition. See if \"choice\" is what they\'re really promoting. I think you will discover that that freedom and choice are not their main concern but that they use those terms to conceal their real agenda in a platable wrapper.


ANTI-CHOICE EXTREMISTS?

Pro-abortion forces have employed the transperent strategy of demoniozing pro-life advocates. Those of us who are pro-life are said to be \"extremist anti-choice forces\"—as if placing a woman\'s desire to terminate her pregnancy over an innocent unborn\'s very right to live isn\'t the extreme of the two positions in this debate. The examples are legion. As a Clinton TV ad put it during the 1992 Democratic primaries, \"We need a president we can trust to protect our most fundamental rights....this yeat the choice is clear. Bill Clinton strongly supports a woman\'s right to choose—he\'s spoken out against...the extremist anti-choice forces. As president, Bill Clinton will work to protect our precious freedoms. He supports the Freedom of Choice Act, and he\'ll work, as he always has, for equal rights and civil rights.\"

Al Gore has also attacked pro-lifers in the same terms. \"I\'m a Christian,\" Gore once told an audience in Philadelphia, but \"we\'ll reject the anti-choice extremists.\" a Gore 2000 press release during the last campaign insisted that \"Bush pandered to anti-choice extremists during the Republican primary.

And when left-wing feminist Gloria Steinem endorsed Gore in the 2000 campaign, she warned that \"the Republican presidentail nomination is in the hands of anti-choice extremists who don\'t even represent the majority of even thier own party.\"

Robin Duke, the president emeritus of the National Abortion Rights Action League and a member of the Planned Parenthood advisory board, also backed Gore during the 2000 campaign, telling fellow abortion rights proponents, \"Let\'s cling to our friend Al Gore, who has supported us. We have enough trouble with anti-choice extremists in Congress.\"

As a conservative, I\'m proudly pro-choice when it comes to matters of personal liberty, and poaaionately pro-life when it comes to matters of life and death.

Like the Founders of our country, I believe in certain absolute and \"self-evident\" moral truths. I believe in a God who created each one of us in His image, which makes each one of our lives sacred and precious and worth of dignity. And I believe that life begins at conception—a fact that scientific advancements are making increasingly harder to deny. That\'s why we conservatives believe in the sanctity of life and proteecting it. Furthermore, once life is protected, we should make sure all Americans have maximum personal freedom to make choices and pursue oppourtunities that improve their own lives, and the lives of others.

In the previous chapter I mentioned how our Founding Fathers used the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to build the foundation for what would eventually be the elimination of slavery. Some believe the founders could have done more, and sooner, to end that awful institution. To them I say, why aren\'t you doing something today to help end the most unconscionable and immoral mistreatment of human life since slavery—abortion? Why are so many of you defending such a modern-day atrocity?

In 1857 the U.S. Supreme court handed down the Dred Scott vs. Sandford decision, ruling that slaves were property and that denying that popert to a slave owner violated the Constitution. In 1973 the Court ruled in the case of Roe vs. Wade that abortion is a privacy right and that denying that right for women violated the Constitution. The Constitution stands for neither slavery nor abortion. Therefore, in order to reach their conclusions, the justices in both cases had to treat human life as if it were something else. But just as the color of ones\' skin doesn\'t make someone a nonperson, neither does the inability to survive outside the mother\'s womb. These are fictions created by the justices to turn the Constitution upside down an deny certain human beings—whatever their physical appearance or stage in life—their God-given right to life. And don\'t tell me that in the case of slavery I\'m confusing life with liberty. To me, life and liberty are inextricably intertwined. Oppressing human beings in the bondage of slavery does more than deny them their freedom. It destroys thier dignity—the worth of their individual lives.

And there\'s another analogy between these twin blots on our nation\'s history. The advocates of both slavery and abortion have been characterized by a stunning zealotry. We know about the proponents of slavery, but look at the modern abortion movement. It has opposed everything from a twenty-four-hour waiting period and spousal consent to pro-;ife counseling (both religious and medical) either outside or inside abortion clinics— again under the decitful heading of \"choice\".

As a father of two young children whose beautiful, tiny, miraculous little fingers and toes I watched on that sonogram monitor in the earliest weeks of my life, I find the contention that abortion is a choice and that somehow our magnificent Consitution confers this right on a mother is absoluteley apalling. When I think about that number—forty-two million unborn children killed by abortion over the past thirty years— it truly angers me. The fact that it is accepted by so many in society truly saddens me.


I don\'t have time right now to post the rest of his argument, but I will later. This should be enough for now.

Kia_Purity
Solid Kia
Inactive
1184 posts
Quote

*sigh*

I\'ll just post some thoughts on this, I suppose.

I am pro-choice... though, I do not like it when there are women who get abortions because they don\'t know what birth control is..
Lately, it seems that some people in the government want women to be a baby making machine but did they ever ask the women how they felt about that?
Some will be fine with that. Some do not want kids, ever. Some only will want one or two kids. It\'s all a matter of opinion.

I can understand if a college-age woman was extremely careful but still got pregnant and couldn\'t afford a baby.

Necro is right about the babies that get put up for adoption. This can be a very messy situation. Some women will instantly regret their choice and whoever adopt their babies will maybe let them visit but most won\'t let them do that. Children do get lost in the system. *sigh and shakes head*

However, I live in a state that\'s pretty too close to the bible belt... so there\'s always a mass fury of extremely religious people harrassing everyone. (It\'s bad enough to drive anyone insane.)

\'sides, it is the women\'s decision. They\'re carrying the baby, aren\'t they? The government is not. The religious people (well, the men :P) is not.


--Mod of Ioekaki--

Best quotes from IRC:
* DrCossack hits Evan on the head with Zero's thong.
<Kia_Purity> wat <Kia_Purity> "Queen of Interordi" <Kia_Purity> who did that? XD (from april fools '06)
* DragonBlayde thwacks Mega_X with Kia's thongs <Kia_Purity> NOT MY THONGS

Staff Backer Doctacosa
Admin
SciLab Official
Benevolent Dictator
Offline
6437 posts
Princess Celestia
Princess Celestia
Got all items in the AFD2012 event!
Acquired on 1 April 2012
Squid beaker
Squid beaker
Earned all 150 original CL achievements
Acquired on 17 January 2016
Unity.EXE emblem
Unity.EXE emblem
Defeat Bass.EXE in the AFD2013 event!
Acquired on 1 April 2013
Zenny
Zenny
Unlock all of the main forum features!
Acquired on 1 April 2014
Lilly Satou
Lilly Satou
Acquired on 1 April 2012

... and 25 more
Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by Necro
This is quite a common debate topic that one would see on online messageboards. Topics on this subject have heated up on past message boards, but I\'d like to have faith in the members here that we can be mature enough to talk about such a topic without flames. Please, everyone, don\'t break this faith of mine. :)


Since I know that someone will ask about my stance on this topic, I\'m going with Necro\'s opinion, which I\'m quoting above. Play nice, people. :)

As Hollow pointed out, some of the arguments of the pro-life clan are just stupid: \"ohh, dead babies pictures!\" So? I suppose that none of those people went to war and saw the horrors happening there. Of course, the pro-choice clan also uses silly arguments to try and make a point.

I\'m against people who use abortions as a mean of birth-control. Some women do that, even if each abortion has a high risk of damaging internal organs... However, I\'m for abortions in cases of rape, or completely unplanned pregnacy. I\'m not getting into the other debate asking if a foetus is a living being or not. I don\'t think that can really be determined anyway.


The admin formerly known as Dr. Cossack.

Looking for me elsewhere? Maybe look at my Fediverse account for some more-or-less random postings! If you're a gamer, check out my Osmium profile. I'm building that tool!

BlueSilver
Rick
Inactive
835 posts
Quote

I think of it like the death sentance. It\'s not something that is good, and if we could get rid of it, we should. But we can\'t, because sometimes bad things are nessicary.

We may think that abortion is wrong, but what about if we did not have it at all?

I agree with the Doc. It\'s something that has a clear cut rightside/ wrongside, and crossing that line is just messed up.

But we need terrible things, to keep this terrible world of ours in check. Rape should not go unnoticed because some people would use if for birth controll. Some things will always be needed no matter how horrible they may seem.


"I worship the Supreme Comrade Cossack!"

HollowTorment
Interordi's Lovable Jerk
Inactive
4805 posts
Quote

I am terribly sorry that something as serious as abortion has to come down to something as asinine as politics and religion.

A very good friend of mine is a conservative..a loud one. :lol: But he\'s pro-choice (except with the partial birth deal, and using abortion as birth control) and doesn\'t let politics cloud his judgement on that one. I applaud him for that.

Quote:
When I think about that number—forty-two million unborn children killed by abortion over the past thirty years— it truly angers me.


Alright. Lets see you magically provide enough food and shelter for those 42 million children when we can\'t even provide for all of the ones alive today. The number appalls me, really. And it only does because this extremist thinks that\'s a large number. I guess extremists think it\'s best to abort abortion so we can have more human fodder for wars. :lol:

About adoption..lets be honest here. The only time you\'re sure that your baby will be adopted, is if you have a good family background..not much disease and cancer and all that..and you\'re white. Hell, childless white folks will pay top dollar for a healthy white baby. But if you happen to be any other color, there\'s a larger chance that your baby will be a foster child for all of his or her childhood.

And about what Kia said..
Quote:
Some women will instantly regret their choice and whoever adopt their babies will maybe let them visit but most won\'t let them do that.
Not only that, but sometimes the adopted child..once finding out it\'s adopted, will want to go back to it\'s actual mother. How would you feel if your child, who you loved and took care of for years, decided to ditch you and go back to it\'s mother who happens to be a drug addict? It\'s happened before. And that was just a general question, not directed at anyone..heh. :)

The funny thing is, most \'pro-life\' people are men. They certainly wouldn\'t be willing to be pregnant, or carry a child for 9 months. So..if they wouldn\'t be willing, what makes them think all women would be?

Phatman Dover
[REDACTED]
Inactive
737 posts
Quote

Quote:
When I think about that number—forty-two million unborn children killed by abortion over the past thirty years— it truly angers me.


[font=BankGothic Lt BT]The problem here isn\'t choice- it\'s too many people dicking around. We all need our sexual organs removed after a second kid. >>

I\'m actually indifferent to this whole thing- I\'m halfway yes and halfway no. Personally, it\'s everyone\'s own right to decide. Male, female, or....other....it doesn\'t really matter. In my belief, a human is not a human until it takes its first breath of air on Earth (and I mean through lungs, too). Until then, all it is is a lump of cells and protien that LOOK like a human. That\'s what we all were until we took that first breath...and cried our little eyes out.

If you argue the fact, then consider this- it\'s called a fetus before it\'s born, but a human after it is. A human what dies is called a corpse, a body- not a human anymore. My point is that when you do not breathe, you are not alive.

And that...is that.[/font]


Reality swirled in a wholly blue manner, revealing absolutely nothing of merit. Things flashed madly in and out of existence like some entirely other sort of phenomena. On a whim, Kurt Vonnegut imploded, taking a sizeable hunk of Massachusetts with him. However, seeing as Massachusetts wasn't entirely sure it existed, the chunk wasn't all that big.

Sage
All Business.
Offline
1762 posts
Quote

\"omg omgh teh great phat has awnseered!!!\"


Abrotions could be right and wrong depending at the way one looks at it....Say it was because the female part was being to stupid when she had a drunk boyfreind and got pregnant thenn yes the parents could of forced her or she seimply could\'nt handle the responsability of owning and takeing care of a kid....It depends on the person point of veiw actually...On can think it\'s bad and one can\'t....Take phat\'s awnser for example how they keep dicking around...That\'s because their to damn lazy to get a job and live a good life so when they do have a kid they are better prepared which keeps abortions from happening....Other then that the people are just plain....well idiots.


Fight, Megaman! For everlasting peace! ~ :o

Unknown
Deleted account
Quote

Post redacted

Necro
Hail to the King, baby!
Inactive
1265 posts
Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by Mega X.exe
Very convincing Necro. However, I\'d like to quote Sean Hannity. He, like myself, is a conservative. This taken from his book Let Freedom Ring. I suggest you read it. WARNING: You may be offended by this, read at your own risk, and keep in mind, this was written in 2002.

\"Liberals say they\'re pro-choice. But they\'re not. They\'re pro-abortion. Think about it. They insist that a woman\'s sovereignty over her own body (read: her convenience) trumps the right to life of an unborn innocent. Women, they say, should have the unfettered right to choose. But what about choice in other walks of life? Then it\'s a different story. When it comes to women\'s freedom to choose better, safer schools for their children—many of whom are trapped in low-quality, dangerous public schools—they\'re anti-choice. The Left opposes tution tax credits, vouchers, K-12 educational savings accounts, and most other forms of parental choice in education.


That\'s honestly a horrible, horrible arguement. I know it\'s not your words really, but I still wanted to point that out. It\'s just twisting the words of those it opposes and takes evidence from other areas without looking into the reasons to discredit the opposition. If someone says they\'re pro-choice, they\'re probably pro-choice and not pro-abortion. Pro-abortion would mean that the person supports abortion completely, and they believe it\'s the right thing to do. Pro-choice doesn\'t mean a person believe\'s it\'s right, it means they\'re not going to try to make the decisions for other people. People can choose not to have abortions as well.

Quote:

Similarly, when it comes to women terrorized by criminals, the Left doesn\'t support a women\'s \"freedom to choose\" to buy a handgun and carry it in her purse or under her jacket should she need it to defend her life or the lives of her children. The Left doesn\'t trust the individual to make the right vhoices concerning her own personal security.


I can\'t really comment on this very much because here in Canada, we have very restrict limitations to guns, and those who do have them have to have a license. I don\'t live anywhere where someone would even need a gun for protection, so there isn\'t much I can say.

Quote:

The Left doesn\'t believe in choice when it comes to hardworking folks choosing their own personal retirement accounts within the context of Social Security, with the potentialof yielding two to three times the earnings of the Social Security system, ehich gives them less than a paltry 2 percent return on their money. The result: large numbers of seniors are living on poverty\'s edge in a situation that\'s only going to get worse as baby boomers retire and the ratio of producers to beneficiaries dramatically declines. But again, the Left doesn\'t trus indiviudals to make the right decisions concerning their own financial security.

So while the Left makes a big deal about the sancticity of choice, we see that choice itself is not the issue. The Left doesn\'t champion the individual\'s right in a host og other areas and prefers to cede control over those decisions to the government. No, this isn\'t about freedom, unless you mean it in the narrowest of contexts.


Again, this is dealing with how a different country is run so I can\'t say much. However, it like the first two arguements is twisting the logic of the opposition into something it isn\'t to support it\'s own claims.

Quote:

This is about a woman\'s freedom to terminate life within her womb. But even here, the dirving force motivating the anti-lifers isn\'t freedom. If it were, the most engaged advocates of \"choice\" wouldn\'t be neutral on which choice the woman ultimately makes. How else do you explain, for instance, their opposition to advising pregnant women of the potentially psychologically devasating impact of that procedure?

Check out the websites of Planned Parenthood and some of the other most militant pro-abortionists and see if I\'m exaggerating about their predisposition. See if \"choice\" is what they\'re really promoting. I think you will discover that that freedom and choice are not their main concern but that they use those terms to conceal their real agenda in a platable wrapper.


This is really an absurd arguement. Pro-choice people are really pro-abortion because they\'re not telling women who are unsure if they want to keep the baby how it can harm them? How in the world does that make sense? I\'m sure if a girl is old enough to get pregnant, she\'s old enough to be responsible for herself to find out about the dangers of abortion. No one makes the decision for a woman to get an abortion but herself, because she is responsible for herself.

Quote:

ANTI-CHOICE EXTREMISTS?

Pro-abortion forces have employed the transperent strategy of demoniozing pro-life advocates. Those of us who are pro-life are said to be \"extremist anti-choice forces\"—as if placing a woman\'s desire to terminate her pregnancy over an innocent unborn\'s very right to live isn\'t the extreme of the two positions in this debate. The examples are legion. As a Clinton TV ad put it during the 1992 Democratic primaries, \"We need a president we can trust to protect our most fundamental rights....this yeat the choice is clear. Bill Clinton strongly supports a woman\'s right to choose—he\'s spoken out against...the extremist anti-choice forces. As president, Bill Clinton will work to protect our precious freedoms. He supports the Freedom of Choice Act, and he\'ll work, as he always has, for equal rights and civil rights.\"


This entire paragraph is doing exactly what it is accusing it\'s opposition of doing, so honestly, it\'s not worth much. Neither would an arguement doing the same to discredit pro-life though. Both sides doing it is equally worthless.



As a conservative, I\'m proudly pro-choice when it comes to matters of personal liberty, and poaaionately pro-life when it comes to matters of life and death.

Quote:

Like the Founders of our country, I believe in certain absolute and \"self-evident\" moral truths. I believe in a God who created each one of us in His image, which makes each one of our lives sacred and precious and worth of dignity. And I believe that life begins at conception—a fact that scientific advancements are making increasingly harder to deny.


Whether or not a fetus is really even a libing being is an entirely different arguement that really hasn\'t been concluded and probably won\'t be. People have different stances but no one is right.

Quote:

In the previous chapter I mentioned how our Founding Fathers used the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to build the foundation for what would eventually be the elimination of slavery. Some believe the founders could have done more, and sooner, to end that awful institution. To them I say, why aren\'t you doing something today to help end the most unconscionable and immoral mistreatment of human life since slavery—abortion? Why are so many of you defending such a modern-day atrocity?


Again, a fetus hasn\'t been proved to be a sentinent living being.


Quote:

And there\'s another analogy between these twin blots on our nation\'s history. The advocates of both slavery and abortion have been characterized by a stunning zealotry. We know about the proponents of slavery, but look at the modern abortion movement. It has opposed everything from a twenty-four-hour waiting period and spousal consent to pro-;ife counseling (both religious and medical) either outside or inside abortion clinics— again under the decitful heading of \"choice\".


Because we all know that men get pregnant and have to carry babies, so they therefore should be able to tell women they have to go through all that. Women shouldn\'t be counselled because the father believes that abortion is wrong and wants to woo her to his side. It\'s her body. Furthermore, if both don\'t have similiar moral values, maybe it\'s best they don\'t have children. Children will grow up confused if both parents try to install different beliefs in them.


Bass GS SP Deluxe
Darkest Navi
Inactive
607 posts
Quote

Ok think about what you people are arguing about, all of us males dont know what its like to be pregnant and have a baby so we should just not talk in subjects such as this, As for you girls or women who have never had a child, you dont know what women go through during pregnancy so you dont reallly have a reason to talk. Also, there are a hell of alot of more important issues in this world today. Also, say you were a girl and you and your boyfriend (if you had one) had intercourse and you got pregnant now assuming that you were still in highschool, roughly 30% of all Mothers still in highschool pass with a diploma, the rest either drop out or fail, is it really worth screwing up your life just to save the life of a baby you didnt even want in the first place. Another thing if a pregnant woman doesnt want a baby they have every god-damn right to have an abortion no matter how far into the pregnancy they are. All of you who say that abortion is up to the woman, than congrats, you are a smart person. Those who say that its killing and should be outlawed, then take your hippie asses over to places such as Iraq and stand there and watch people die of disease and bullets and many other greusome causes of death, you think abortion s worse than that, well your wrong abortion is like swatting an already dead fly compared to the atrocities goin on over there. Case Closed


Ok, i am not trying to offend anyone. I am not trying to say people cant have an opinion, im just trying to make a point and to discourage more people friom making more pointless threads such as this in the future. have a good day and for those who practically live and breath arguing over this stuff, GET A LIFE!


Ok im done now, bye:cool:

[Edited on 13-6-2004 by Bass GS SP Deluxe]


After a few years of self exile, I'm BACK BABY, YEAHH!
"When was the last time the wind ever said "HOSTILES!" to you?" "Never." "Exactly!" (G.o.W.)

Image

join the bionicle guild in our fight to protect the weak! join at http://onau.hyperboards.com

My new m-board: Moderators wanted:
http://undernetsquare.proboards31.com


I am the ruler of the Undernet, and my home is in Black Earth. I also harness the 5 legendary Evil Chips. All who oppose me......shal die. Muhahahaha!

Mega X.exe
Forum Ghost
Offline
6444 posts
Quote

[quote]Originally posted by Bass GS SP Deluxe
Ok think about what you people are arguing about, all of us males dont know what its like to be pregnant and have a baby so we should just not talk in subjects such as this, As for you girls or women who have never had a child, you dont know what women go through during pregnancy so you dont reallly have a reason to talk. Also, there are a hell of alot of more important issues in this world today. Also, say you were a girl and you and your boyfriend (if you had one) had intercourse and you got pregnant now assuming that you were still in highschool, roughly 30% of all Mothers still in highschool pass with a diploma, the rest either drop out or fail, is it really worth screwing up your life just to save the life of a baby you didnt even want in the first place. Another thing if a pregnant woman doesnt want a baby they have every god-damn right to have an abortion no matter how far into the pregnancy they are. All of you who say that abortion is up to the woman, than congrats, you are a smart person. Those who say that its killing and should be outlawed, then take your hippie asses over to places such as Iraq and stand there and watch people die of disease and bullets and many other greusome causes of death, you think abortion s worse than that, well your wrong abortion is like swatting an already dead fly compared to the atrocities goin on over there. Case Closed


Ok, i am not trying to offend anyone. I am not trying to say people cant have an opinion, im just trying to make a point and to discourage more people friom making more pointless threads such as this in the future. have a good day and for those who practically live and breath arguing over this stuff, GET A LIFE!


Ok im done now, bye:cool:

[Edited on 13-6-2004 by Bass GS SP Deluxe] [/quote]

Case closed? Hippie ass? Your argument isn\'t convincing, just humorous.

Hippie am I? Look, I\'m against killing innocents, not evildoers, I am for the Iraq war because I feel they are a threat to world peace.

Saddam is an evil man. He has done evil things. You want hippies? Talk to the Liberals. They Blamed Bush Sr. for starting the Gulf War. Sorry, didn\'t Saddam start it? Guess not.

Sage
All Business.
Offline
1762 posts
Quote

[quote]Originally posted by Bass GS SP Deluxe
Ok think about what you people are arguing about, all of us males dont know what its like to be pregnant and have a baby so we should just not talk in subjects such as this, As for you girls or women who have never had a child, you dont know what women go through during pregnancy so you dont reallly have a reason to talk. Also, there are a hell of alot of more important issues in this world today. Also, say you were a girl and you and your boyfriend (if you had one) had intercourse and you got pregnant now assuming that you were still in highschool, roughly 30% of all Mothers still in highschool pass with a diploma, the rest either drop out or fail, is it really worth screwing up your life just to save the life of a baby you didnt even want in the first place. Another thing if a pregnant woman doesnt want a baby they have every god-damn right to have an abortion no matter how far into the pregnancy they are. All of you who say that abortion is up to the woman, than congrats, you are a smart person. Those who say that its killing and should be outlawed, then take your hippie asses over to places such as Iraq and stand there and watch people die of disease and bullets and many other greusome causes of death, you think abortion s worse than that, well your wrong abortion is like swatting an already dead fly compared to the atrocities goin on over there. Case Closed


Ok, i am not trying to offend anyone. I am not trying to say people cant have an opinion, im just trying to make a point and to discourage more people friom making more pointless threads such as this in the future. have a good day and for those who practically live and breath arguing over this stuff, GET A LIFE!


Ok im done now, bye:cool:

[Edited on 13-6-2004 by Bass GS SP Deluxe] [/quote]


No offense but I agree with X...I\'ll even add on to what he said...You sound like a damn politician running in a campaign for president.....and Iraq started the war when they threw away the agreement they made with the WOMD...That were found then they destroyed them...or so thought they did......and your arguement is not even convinceing as Mega said....more humourous then convinceing....as I said you sound like a politician.



[Edited on 6/14/04 by Sage Cryst]


Fight, Megaman! For everlasting peace! ~ :o

Mega X.exe
Forum Ghost
Offline
6444 posts
Quote

Oh, and I forgot to ask, just how is abortion swatting a dead fly? That anolgy makes no sense.

HollowTorment
Interordi's Lovable Jerk
Inactive
4805 posts
Quote

Hey fools, be the better men and don\'t make this a political topic.

BassGS, you have very ummm..strong opinions, yes. But you said yourself that people \'shouldn\'t talk\' unless they\'re essientially pregnant or have had an abortion. So..have you had an abortion? Or maybe a little nipper is coming? How far along are you, anyway?

And Sage, it\'s politician.

Bass GS SP Deluxe
Darkest Navi
Inactive
607 posts
Quote

Mega X, Im not calling you a hippie, im not even sure why i used that. my post was partially meant to be Humorous, Also i had no intention of sounding like a polititian (i despise politics very much)and my analogy is simply saying that the Killings going on over in Iraq and that area are 1000 times worse than abortion

Hollow Torment: Im not so sure about you but im a Male, and was only posting what i posted to try and get people to get a life and stop making pointless threads about topics such as this.


After a few years of self exile, I'm BACK BABY, YEAHH!
"When was the last time the wind ever said "HOSTILES!" to you?" "Never." "Exactly!" (G.o.W.)

Image

join the bionicle guild in our fight to protect the weak! join at http://onau.hyperboards.com

My new m-board: Moderators wanted:
http://undernetsquare.proboards31.com


I am the ruler of the Undernet, and my home is in Black Earth. I also harness the 5 legendary Evil Chips. All who oppose me......shal die. Muhahahaha!

Mega X.exe
Forum Ghost
Offline
6444 posts
Quote

This thread isn\'t pointless. Last time I checked, its point was to have a debate about abortion.

HollowTorment
Interordi's Lovable Jerk
Inactive
4805 posts
Quote

The thread isn\'t pointless when intelligent people are discussing their views (and the pros and cons) of a serious issue.

Which is what we were doing until we got OMG U GUYS GET A LIEF.

Gutter Mouth
Plastic Grass
Inactive
653 posts
Quote

im not sure i see how this thread is so pointless. Haven\'t you ever seen one of those T.v. shows where for an hour 4 old people just talk about topics going on in the world and crap. If they made a show out of it and spend money on it. I dont think its pointless. There is a purpose. You can change the way people think, and if people are thinking 24/7 then i could change alot about them. Not like that happens that much but it could. You dont know.....

[Edited on 20-6-2004 by Gutter Mouth]

Nakayori
Robot master
Inactive
87 posts
Quote

I know most of this is probably already said, but I\'m repeating anyway.

I\'m not very fond of abortion, but if a lady wants to pay a doctor hundreds of dollars to go up and snip pieces of a soon to be human being and might accidentally kill an organ, that\'s their choice. Abortion shouldn\'t necessarily be illegal, but it\'d be nice if people thought of other ways to work things out. Atleast try. If they don\'t want to do that, go for adoption.

Quote:
Originally posted by Gutter Mouthwell well well, if you think its so wrong, what would you do if you were a woman and you were a rape victim.


Just because of that, you\'d get an abortion? So what if you didn\'t plan on having a baby? You still have to take full responsibility. Even if it was part of a complete stranger, it would be part of you, as well. Pretend you\'re a woman, married, had a loving husband, etc., etc. You have a baby. You love it because it\'s \'your\' baby. A year later, you get raped and you\'re pregnant once again. You plan for abortion. Why? It\'s the same as your other child. It\'s still part of you. If you didn\'t want to get raped, you should have planned on taking a self defense class. Besides, God had a reason for giving people reproduction devices. It\'s to.. hmm.. I don\'t know. Reproduct, maybe? Why in the world would God give you those organs if you\'re not to going to create new humans to replace the old?

Quote:
Originally posted by NecroHonestly, if someone isn\'t willing to adopt a child themself, why would they tell another to put their child up for adoption?


Because they were raped and didn\'t want a child, maybe?

I could go on and on about the issues of abortion, but I\'m not exactly in the mood for debating, so I\'ll just leave it at that.

[Edited on 6/26/2004 by Nakayori]


Image

Kia_Purity
Solid Kia
Inactive
1184 posts
Quote

Pfft.

How can you speak of that so lightly? Rape victims go through emotional damage. That\'s why it\'s called Rape. They do not want to carry the trauma from that incident.

Is it wrong to force a woman to carry a baby that she does not want from a very traumatic experience? Is it?!

In any case, there are \"solutions\" but they\'re not too much of solutions because there are already problems with adoption as it is. What other solutions do you suggest?


--Mod of Ioekaki--

Best quotes from IRC:
* DrCossack hits Evan on the head with Zero's thong.
<Kia_Purity> wat <Kia_Purity> "Queen of Interordi" <Kia_Purity> who did that? XD (from april fools '06)
* DragonBlayde thwacks Mega_X with Kia's thongs <Kia_Purity> NOT MY THONGS

Mega X.exe
Forum Ghost
Offline
6444 posts
Quote

OK, let\'s say I get beat up by someone. If I don\'t want to carry the trauma, then does that merit me killing him?

Kia_Purity
Solid Kia
Inactive
1184 posts
Quote

...*sighs*...

That comparasion is weak. You\'re a guy.

Edit-- I knew I should\'ve added more:

Yeah, but as I said, you are a guy. So, if someone beats you up, you techincally are already inclined to beat that person up in blind rage unless you choose to be better and walk off.

The society has defined men to be strong and women to be weak, so women aren\'t exactly strong except for athletles (but sadly, althetic women do get raped...)

I\'ve taken self defense class myself and I was the only one who could knock the teacher\'s assistant (a male) to the ground. The class was set up to give the women the sense that there was danger, so they had to fight.

Then again, I\'m not really the typical woman because I don\'t get scared, I end up channeling my fear into rage... x_x;

I dunno if that even made sense or not. *sigh*

[Edited on 27-6-2004 by Kia_Purity]


--Mod of Ioekaki--

Best quotes from IRC:
* DrCossack hits Evan on the head with Zero's thong.
<Kia_Purity> wat <Kia_Purity> "Queen of Interordi" <Kia_Purity> who did that? XD (from april fools '06)
* DragonBlayde thwacks Mega_X with Kia's thongs <Kia_Purity> NOT MY THONGS